Monday, September 12, 2016

Major General Paul Vallely (Ret): 'Why Has America Lost its Friends and Allies?'


'The Chessboard is Changing!'

This paper was written by MG Vallely and was provided to the Trump campaign last week.

By Paul E. Vallely, MG US Army (Ret.)

Each day as I watch the news reports of recent events from across the globe, I wonder, "Who are America's friends anymore?" Try as I might, I can no longer readily identify them. It seems our longtime friends and allies are in retreat. And I am forced to ask myself, "How many of us are aware of this and have noticed that it's happening?"  Having visited the Middle East (Turkey, Syria, and Egypt) and Europe several times during the current administration’s two terms of office, I witnessed unquestionable signs of the downward spiral in US credibility and respect.  Those who counted on us for friendship and support in tackling world problems and threats – and who we counted on as well in return – are now nervous, skeptical and afraid.

For example, the Egyptians could not understand why, after so many decades of friendship, an American administration would spurn their civil uprising against the Muslim Brotherhood. They cannot understand why an American administration would have shut off US military modernization assistance at such a critical time in the Middle East.

Any special relationships garnered since World War II appear to have either disappeared or are certainly in decline. Clearly, confidence in us as the world's foremost leader has dissipated due to this administration's choice to cast aside allies and marginalize friends, despite our enemies becoming more numerous.

The international chessboard is clearly changing but not for the benefit of America.

Why is this so?  For me, there can be no question, it is the direct result of Progressive Socialism, which has permeated both our governing parties. The harsh truth is we do not have competent senior government officials. Our current lot are, sadly, only amateurs at handling foreign relations and our national security. We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to push us down the road of progressivism leading to the ultimate destruction of the America we have known and love. We cannot continue to allow our national prestige and honor to be decimated at home and abroad. We must commit ourselves to creating the solution.

The ever growing damage incurred at the hands of the progressives specifically translates into significant pain that must be endured while we work to resurrect the United States’ international reputation.  If our friends are to trust and admire us, and our allies are to respect us, combine forces with us, and when appropriate, defer to us, our former standing as the world’s sole super-power must be renewed and reestablished.

The chessboard must be reset, and reset now, before chaos and irreparable damage become a permanent part of the fabric of this country.

The current battle that America faces, is against the incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty of our senior leaders and their cavalier violation of the US Constitution.  More specifically, the very oaths of office of certain well-identified, elected and appointed officials have been utterly abandoned and betrayed. It is undeniable that the Obama White House, State Department, and CIA have been peculiarly inept at working with our allies or confronting our enemies, to the point that it has jeopardized some of our most important relationships.

To our friends (whomever they may be now), this directly relates to our national character, our alliances, our mutual security, our interwoven economies, and the trueness and viability of our friendship, not to mention our leadership.

If you think about it, it is a hard task to identify our last diplomatic victory.  In fact, my best assessment of the most recent diplomatic victories for America were the results of the Reagan administration’s strengths, which led to the fall of the Berlin Wall, followed by the breakup of the Soviet Union. It is apparent that our leadership has never caught up to the realities of the new world order ever since.

Based on just such utter confusion regarding our nation’s proper role in the world, Hillary Clinton traveled the world, setting new State Department records for burning fuel, with no record of diplomatic success anywhere.  Certainly, none that I can document. John Kerry is following the same path, continually trying to reuse old, tired, and failed ploys.

No less dismaying is Mr. Obama’s attitude toward U.S. friends. A particularly cogent example was his decision to allow, if not support, diplomatic attacks against Israel regarding the 2010 flotilla blockades into Gaza. His utopian idea was that he would, thereby, purchase goodwill throughout the Middle East.  It is pure folly to think that distancing ourselves from the Israelis will buy us leverage with the Muslim states. Of the plethora of other examples, this is as clearly indicative of his wrong mindedness as any from his 2008 election until now.

Additionally, Turkey, an old ally, has now changed the current chessboard and is cozying up with Iran while entrenching itself on the side of Sharia-dictated Islamism.  We must remember that Turkey was responsible for encouraging and supporting the flotilla against the Israeli naval blockade, which was a blatant forecast of the direction we only now see fully revealing itself.

Or consider Saudi Arabia, which is rightfully upset with the way Obama has handled Syria, Iran, and the Palestinian issues, not to mention his awkward and incompetent (at best) approach to the ISIS situation.  From the Saudi’s perspective, Obama brought everyone to the brink, then he just washed his hands of it all, in favor of appeasement and talks with Iran and kowtowing to Russia. Further, Obama’s drawing and then erasing the red line in Syria may have even greater significance, but is simply another illustration of the same failure already established in the early years of his first term. Not one of his “diplomatic” moves included discussions with the Saudis and their neighbors.

The Obama administration cannot even bring itself to accurately characterize the enemies that it must admit we have. Their National Security strategy declares we are at war with “Al Qaeda and its affiliates.” Islamist extremists? Jihadis? No, they will not admit that. Senior officials have repeatedly insisted that they understand that radical Islamism runs counter to the authoritative teachings of an altogether peace-loving religion—when the truth is that all religions, including Islam, have within them entirely authentic, deeply rooted, and often sophisticated fanatical streams. In the case of Islam though, it is the controlling factor. This refusal to acknowledge the creed of our enemies is further evidence of a lack of strategic seriousness. His military half-measures and weak kneed response to our own threats immeasurably amplify the clear and present danger our allies face.

What about Russia?  Friend or enemy, or both?  The one thing we know is that now, after decades of successfully preventing Russia from grabbing a position of power in the Middle East, Obama’s failed policies have empowered Russia to establish itself as the most powerful rising player on the field.  As a result, President Vladimir Putin of Russia rises as a diplomatic hero and is charming much of the world, despite their knowledge of the Russian government’s nefarious intentions.

Consider as well our enemy North Korea.  Analyzing Obama’s misguided actions in this case involves first returning to the Clinton administration, which set in motion their nuclear proliferation.  Then the Bush administration never took charge of the situation, and the Obama administration has followed suit.  Obama has allowed this enemy to increase its level of threat vastly beyond anything we might have imagined had there been the slightest competence or seriousness of response.

Most serious of all, however, may be the consequences of the disastrous Iran Nuclear agreement.  Simply put, there is not one aspect of it that is in alignment with American interest.
This administration perpetually plays into the hands of our enemies while continuously marginalizing friends. Therefore, we must demand the transfer of power away from derelict and incompetent officials.  The one and only way we are able to accomplish this is through our vote.
The Declaration of Independence states:

“To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”
The oath of office is simple and reads:

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Sadly, we have seen in the current administration as never before, that elected and appointed officials violate their oaths, constantly and consistently. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities. They effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold us all to the highest bidder.

Clearly, this is not the exclusive sin of those in our executive branch of government.  Congress, too, enjoys the riches of extortion and “get rich” schemes abound through the intentional misuse of campaign funds.

To cure these ills, we must understand and remember that our Constitution grants the federal government the necessary authority to cultivate, promote, and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of that authority, on the one hand, and the opposing individual liberties we enjoy as persons on the other, was established for the ages. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution by means of the most well-designed check and balances any nation has ever created.
Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address:

“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”

In our lifetime, “rising up” means making change through other means than revolution, and NOT by force of arms. The people must “rise up” from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are righteously limited, yet fully empowered in the peaceful transfer of power by these various means: impeachment, forced resignation, natural death, or secure elections.  Now is the moment to transfer power by election.

“We the People” are fed up.  We have had enough.
The Obama Administration and identifiable members of Congress have taken America on a death march, reducing our country to new lows and jeopardizing our very survival as a nation. It is imperative that the “people” open their eyes, educate themselves, decide to stand up for this great country by defying those who tear her down, destroying our future and that of our friends and allies as well.

Hillary Clinton is no more and no less than the continued expression of all these destructive forces.
America must reject her bid for election.

For any and all flaws he may present, Donald Trump is the only answer to all these problems.  We must rise up as a people and elect him, if we are to save our country.

Once again, we must build friendships not destroy them. Once again, we must live up to the legacy of our forefathers, and create anew a nation guided by its Constitution, to be by, of and for the people.  Our friends will only be friends if we do.  Our enemies will only fear us when we do.
_______

MG Vallely is the Chairman of Stand Up America US




Get Your 'Hillary Liar' T-Shirt Before They're All Gone! 
(Just kidding, that's a lie but it is pretty cool)

ORDER YOUR HILLARY LIAR T-SHIRT TODAY!

Hillary Liar T-Shirt


Sunday, September 11, 2016

Video of Hillary COLLAPSING at 9 11 Event in NYC


I'm no doctor but on a relatively cool NYC morning Hillary's collapse does not appear to these untrained eyes simply due to overheating!

9/11+15: Dick and Liz Cheney On Barack Obama's World!


September 11, 2001: Always Remember, Never Forget!

Instead of writing an article providing my thoughts about the state of the world and U.S. national security after 8-years of Barack Obama in the White House, Dick and Liz Cheney do a much better job in this WSJ article!

By DICK CHENEY and LIZ CHENEY
The Wall Street Journal
Sept. 9, 2016 6:45 p.m. ET
.
Fifteen years ago this Sunday, nearly 3,000 Americans were killed in the deadliest attack on the U.S. homeland in our history. A decade and a half later, we remain at war with Islamic terrorists. Winning this war will require an effort of greater scale and commitment than anything we have seen since World War II, calling on every element of our national power.

Defeating our enemies has been made significantly more difficult by the policies of Barack Obama. No American president has done more to weaken the U.S., hobble our defenses or aid our adversaries.

President Obama has been more dedicated to reducing America’s power than to defeating our enemies. He has enhanced the abilities, reach and finances of our adversaries, including the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, at the expense of our allies and our own national security. He has overseen a decline of our own military capabilities as our adversaries’ strength has grown.
Our Air Force today is the oldest and smallest it has ever been. In January 2015, then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno testified that the Army was as unready as it had been at any other time in its history. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert testified similarly that, “Navy readiness is at its lowest point in many years.”

Nearly half of the Marine Corps’ non-deployed units—the ones that respond to unforeseen contingencies—are suffering shortfalls, according to the commandant of the Corps, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. For the first time in decades, American supremacy in key areas can no longer be assured.
The president who came into office promising to end wars has made war more likely by diminishing America’s strength and deterrence ability. He doesn’t seem to understand that the credible threat of military force gives substance and meaning to our diplomacy. By reducing the size and strength of our forces, he has ensured that future wars will be longer, and put more American lives at risk.

Meanwhile, the threat from global terrorist organizations has grown. Nicholas Rasmussen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, told the House Homeland Security Committee in July that, “As we approach 15 years since 9/11, the array of terrorist actors around the globe is broader, wider and deeper than it has been at any time since that day.” Despite Mr. Obama’s claim that ISIS has been diminished, John Brennan, Mr. Obama’s CIA director, told the Senate Intelligence Committee in June that, “Our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability or global reach.”

The president’s policies have contributed to our enemies’ advance. In his first days in office, Mr. Obama moved to take the nation off a war footing and return to the failed policies of the 1990s when terrorism was treated as a law-enforcement matter. It didn’t matter that the Enhanced Interrogation Program produced information that prevented attacks, saved American lives and, we now know, contributed to the capture and killing of Osama bin Laden. Mr. Obama ended the program, publicly revealed its techniques, and failed to put any effective terrorist-interrogation program in its place.

We are no longer interrogating terrorists in part because we are no longer capturing terrorists. Since taking office, the president has recklessly pursued his objective of closing the detention facility at Guantanamo by releasing current detainees—regardless of the likelihood they will return to the field of battle against us. Until recently, the head of recruitment for ISIS in Afghanistan and Pakistan was a former Guantanamo detainee, as is one of al Qaeda’s most senior leaders in the Arabian Peninsula.

As he released terrorists to return to the field of battle, Mr. Obama was simultaneously withdrawing American forces from Iraq and Afghanistan. He calls this policy “ending wars.” Most reasonable people recognize this approach as losing wars.

When Mr. Obama took the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2009, Iraq was stable. Following the surge ordered by President Bush, al Qaeda in Iraq had largely been defeated, as had the Shiite militias. The situation was so good that Vice President Joe Biden predicted, “Iraq will be one of the great achievements of this administration.”

Today, Iraq’s border with Syria has been erased by the most successful and dangerous terrorist organization in history. ISIS has established its “caliphate” across a large swath of territory in the heart of Syria and Iraq, from which it trains, recruits, plots and launches attacks.

On Aug. 20, 2012, Mr. Obama drew a red line making clear he would take military action if Syrian President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons. A year later, Mr. Assad launched a sarin-gas attack on his own people in the suburbs of Damascus. Mr. Obama did nothing—a failure that destroyed America’s credibility and strengthened the hand of our adversaries.

We now know that the president’s refusal to act came as the Iranians and the U.S. were engaged in secret talks about Iran’s nuclear program. In his new book, “The Iran Wars,” Wall Street Journal correspondent Jay Solomon writes that according to Iranian sources, “Tehran made it clear to the American delegation that the nuclear negotiations would be halted if the U.S. went ahead with its attack on Assad.” The Iranians were now in the driver’s seat, not just regarding their own policy in the Middle East, but in determining America’s.

President Obama and Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were so concerned with pleasing Iran’s ruling mullahs that they were willing to overlook the American blood on Iranian hands and decades of Iran’s activities as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. In pursuit of the nuclear deal, they made concession after dangerous concession.

Every promise made to the American people about the Obama nuclear agreement has been broken. We were promised a “world-class” verification process. Instead, the Iranians are allowed in key instances to verify themselves.

We were promised the agreement would “block every pathway” to an Iranian nuclear weapon. Instead, the Obama-Clinton agreement virtually guarantees an Iranian nuclear weapon, gives them access to the latest in centrifuge technology and will likely usher in a nuclear arms race across the Middle East.

We were promised that non-nuclear sanctions, including those that block Iran’s access to hard currency and our financial systems, would remain in place. Instead, the Obama administration has paid the mullahs at least $1.7 billion in cash, which includes at least $1.3 billion in U.S. taxpayer money, the first installment of which was ransom for the release of American hostages.

In case there is any doubt that the regime will use these funds to support terror, Iran’s parliament recently passed Article 22 of its 2016-2017 budget, mandating that all such funds be transferred directly to the Iranian military. Fifteen years after 3,000 Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists, America’s commander in chief has become the money launderer in chief for the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.

Iran isn’t the only adversary benefiting from the age of Obama. Russia is threatening NATO, invading sovereign territory, selling air-defense systems to the Iranians, using its military to defend the Assad regime, bombing American-backed rebels in Syria, and playing a larger role in the Middle East than at any time since Anwar Sadat expelled his Soviet advisers from Egypt in 1972.

Across the region, nations that previously were strong American allies are making different calculations. Russia is seen as a reliable ally standing with Mr. Assad, while the U.S. walks away from its friends. The steady stream of visitors from the Middle East to Moscow, including most recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is evidence of Moscow’s growing role in the region. Neither Russia nor Vladmir Putin shares America’s interests.

China is also ascendant—threatening freedom of navigation through the South China Sea and developing weapons systems that directly threaten American military superiority. North Korea represents a growing nuclear threat to the U.S. homeland. Mr. Obama’s announced pivot to Asia turned out to be hollow, further alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies in the region.

Undoing this damage will require an effort of historic proportions. Our next president must abandon Mr. Obama’s fantasy that unilaterally disarming, retreating and abandoning our allies will bring peace and security. We must begin at once to rebuild our military. This means ending sequestration and returning to a Defense Department budget built around defeating the threats to our nation. We must remedy readiness shortfalls, modernize and upgrade our nuclear arsenal, develop and build a robust missile-defense system, and invest in technologies necessary to maintain our military superiority, particularly against advances by adversaries like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

Among the most important lessons of 9/11 was that terrorists must be denied safe havens from which to plan and launch attacks against us. On President Obama’s watch, terrorist safe havens have expanded around the globe.

Our next president must recognize that Islamic terrorists pose an existential threat to the U.S., and must instruct the military to provide plans necessary to defeat them and deny them safe havens. These should include expanding the pace of our air campaign against ISIS, removing the onerous rules of engagement, and dedicating additional special operators and other American forces as necessary to defeat our enemies.

Winning the war against Islamic terrorists will also require that we rebuild our intelligence capabilities. Our next president should reinstate the Enhanced Interrogation Program, ensure that Guantanamo remains open so we have a facility to hold enemy combatants, and increase our intelligence activities so we can identify and disrupt plots before they are carried out.

We must make clear that we will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon or become nuclear capable. Our next president should renounce the Obama-Clinton nuclear agreement, develop a strategy in consultation with our allies in the region to address Iran’s state sponsorship of terror, and make clear that all options are on the table where Iran’s nuclear program is concerned.

We must also rebuild our relationships with allies across the globe so that we can build the coalitions necessary to defeat Islamic terrorism and restore our strength and power. This includes reinvigorating NATO and affirming America’s unshakable commitment to the most effective military alliance in history.

Generations before have met and defeated grave threats to our nation. American strength, leadership and ideals were crucial to the Allied victory in World War II and the defeat of Soviet Communism during the Cold War. It will be up to today’s generation to restore American pre-eminence so that we can defend our freedom and defeat Islamic terror.

Since World War II, America has been freedom’s defender—for ourselves and for millions around the world. We do this because our security depends upon it and because there is no other nation that can.

As Americans calculate the costs of leadership, we must remember that the costs of failing to lead—or of inaction—are much higher. Imagine a world where Russia, Iran, China and North Korea set the rules; where militant Islam spreads its evil ideology unchallenged across the globe; where parts of Europe are once again enslaved by Russia, our NATO alliance impotent; and where China achieves military superiority over the U.S. and dominates Asia and beyond.

Finally, imagine a world where the terrorists and their leading state sponsor have nuclear weapons. Fifteen years after 9/11, we can say with certainty that this is the world that will be created by withdrawal and retreat—by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s policies—if we don’t reverse course.

Mr. Cheney was U.S. vice president from 2001-09. Ms. Cheney is the Republican nominee for Wyoming’s at-large seat in the House.

Source: The Wall Street Journal
Photo



Get Your 'Hillary Liar' T-Shirt Before They're All Gone! 
(Just kidding, that's a lie but it is pretty cool)

ORDER YOUR HILLARY LIAR T-SHIRT TODAY!

Hillary Liar T-Shirt


Saturday, September 10, 2016

True or False? "Hillary Clinton has 1 Year to Live" (Video)


Just Another Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory Or The Facts?

Watch, decide for yourself and then read the additional text explaining it all below.

Caveat: The author has chosen to be an anonymous source and unfortunately that affects credibility.



'I am a professor at a medical school. I have taught at three institutions (currently in my third). I will not provide my exact credentials because several people who have tried to speak out against Hillary Clinton have been killed (look up "Clinton Body Count"). The Clintons have also ruined the lives of others who have spoken out, including Drew Pinsky. Drew Pinsky had his show canceled and received death threats, and Huffington Post writer David Seaman was terminated and is living in hiding for his columns about Hillary's health. Thanks for understanding the reason why I do not disclose my exact credentials.

Hillary Clinton might actually have 1 year to live based on medical records that were leaked indicating she has a disease called Subcortical Vascular Dementia. While many videos have been made about her health, all of them have missed the severity of her illness. She could die very soon, since Vascular Dementia is progressive and has a 3-5 year life expectancy. Clinton actually has a severe form of the disease that impacts the subcortex region of the brain, which includes the brainstem. This might explain why Clinton is dry-coughing so much. The brainstem controls primitive functions of the body like breathing, heart rate, and blood pressure. When there is ischemia to this region, B/P, HR, and breathing won't function correctly. Hillary's cough is so noticeable because she can't seem to get over it. Most people only need a couple of coughs and they are able to overcome what is in their throat. But not Hillary. Hillary has tried to explain that she has an "allergic cough." This is completely false and a lie. Based on her medical records, it is related to her Vascular Dementia, which she is dying of. She could rapidly decline if circulation is weak to the brainstem. I am very concerned about Hillary, and if her VaD diagnosis is true, she would likely face increasing difficulties over the next few months.

Hillary's health record also states that she has "complex partial seizures." I have witnessed many people who have had seizures, and I believe Hillary is definitely showing signs of seizing activity. With complex partial seizures, one can show signs such as head nodding or lip smacking. Hillary, has had several instances where she appears to have had a seizure, the most well-known is when she was in front of a group of reporters. External, noxious stimuli can trigger seizing in certain individuals. Hillary had a seizure in front of the reporters. Not unsurprisingly, they are trying to control her seizures using a Diazepam autoinjector. Autoinjectors are used with urgent drugs such as Diazepam and Epinephrine in order to stop an life-threatening event from happening. If Hillary has seizures, they could cause an oxygen deficiency in the brain, resulting in damage and further progression of her VaD. An autoinjector is needed to control the seizure.

Many doctors are not speaking out about Hillary's health, but trust me, they are thinking about it and talking amongst themselves. If you specialize in neurosurgery, neurology, or neurovascular specialities as a doctor, no doubt it is quite obvious that Hillary has a big problem. She can barely walk up stairs and can't stand very long, has to hold on to side rails, etc. This makes sense, because she has VaD of the subcortex which involves the cerebellum (involved in controlling gross motor movements). Hillary, for the most part, can still deliver scripted speeches on green screens, so she still has some function. However, VaD will result in a rapid decline in function of the patient. VaD has a average life expectancy of 3-5 years (about 4 years according to the NHS). Hillary is entering into her final year of life since she was diagnosed with VaD in 2013. Why is she running for president if she is going to die soon? Does it have to do with Obama's Third Term?'

 H/T IOTW

Thursday, September 8, 2016

A Short Story: Why James Comey Let Hillary Skate!


The story you are about to read sounds extremely viable as it explains why it was that FBI Director James Comey allowed Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to skate!

I received the following story in an email this morning (H/T Max and Lill) and it concerns the confusing refusal of FBI Director James Comey to recommend indicting Hillary Clinton for any crime, despite what appeared to be substantial evidence offered in his own words at a press conference that she did indeed commit one if not more of them!

If this story is true (and it certainly sounds as if it most definitely could be) it is yet another sad example of how our system of government has been hijacked by what appears to be nothing more than a crime syndicate in the form of a presidential administration operating in conjunction with the rich elites who seem to get away with whatever they want.

The story...

You lawyers will understand how this works.
We are definitely in a state where our government is filled with corruption. I hate to think where that can lead.

Hillary & The FBI 

Worth taking the time to read because this
story is starting to leak out from FBI agents and others
"who are in the know" inside the Washington
beltway!

>The agents at the FBI are livid that Comey
> did what he did. They are claiming there was more than
> sufficient evidence to bring several indictments against
> Hillary Clinton. It wasn't a slam dunk case, but it had
> more than a good probability of a conviction for Hillary
> Clinton. 

>Lynch and Obama made it clear to Comey that
> if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the
> Democrat nominee for president out of the election. If he
> failed to get a conviction he would be facing charges of
> tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal
> election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life
> in prison, and Obama and Lynch, as well as others, would see
> to it that he did. 

Now you know why he presented his case
> the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to
> not press for an indictment. given without a court reporter
> present or without any recording of her testimony to prevent
> her from having any further exposure to legal charges like
> perjury. If she lied to Congress, they have no written FBI
> deposition to confront Hillary with. 

This was set up to let
> her walk without fear of being charged with giving False
> Testimony or being charged with Obstruction of Justice. This
> is what those in the "legalese world" call a
> "Straw Man" legal charge. (It is a charge designed
> to make someone appear innocent of the charges!) 

EXAMPLE:
> Bill beats up Shirley at their home. Bill is arrested for
> "Felony Spousal Abuse" . Bill's lawyer gets
> the charges dismissed because Bill is not married to
> Shirley! (They are only "live in boyfriend and
> girlfriend".) Bill walks out of court totally
> exonerated of the charges thanks to a technicality! The
> twist in the case is the arresting officer knew all along
> Bill was not married to Shirley because the officer and Bill
> are old fraternity brothers. The officer intentionally
> charged Bill with something he knew would not stick. Bill
> would easily have been convicted of Assault and Battery, but
> he was never worried.

Hillary's statement to the FBI was
> intentionally to be charged with that! This is what is known as
> the "STRAW MAN" charge. It is how you make a
> guilty person appear innocent. This is exactly what was done
> with the Hillary Clinton case! 

> If she had been charged with
>"Destruction of Government Documents", she would
> have easily been convicted, because she admitted to doing
> this! Instead, she was charged with "Mishandling
> Classified Documents" which has wiggle room for
> reasonable doubt regarding Criminal Intent! I think citizens
> are finally fed up with the Clintons and the cesspool of
> corruption that is our current government. Real Americans
> are ready to take our country back. All of these years of
> corruption have taken a toll on American lives. Citizens
> opinions of a lying White House, a corrupt Congress, the
> "pay to play" politicians, the legalese lawyers
> and lobbyists, big overspending "welfare
> mentality" government, the "looking for a loop
> hole" justice system, the lying media, and our censored
> educational system with an agenda to dumb down the next
> generation, is at the lowest point ever. Hillary is on the
> wrong side of every issue. 

> The British Exit from the EU (Brexit) is
> just a small sign that real citizens of civilized nations
> are ready to take their country back. They are sick of the
> results of open borders and globalization led by power
> hungry elites. 

Hillary Clinton has no character or
> integrity. She is an arrogant, condescending political elite
> who is only interested in lining the Clinton pockets with
> donations to the Clinton Foundation (wink, wink) from PACS,
> lobbyists, and foreign nations that buy access and favors.
> The Clinton Foundation is nothing more than an operation
> used to launder money for the Clintons and other politicians
> involved in illegal activities. The Clintons are able to use
> the information of those participating to obtain cover for
> their activities, or blackmail those who are laundering
> money through them. Just count the number of politicians who
> arrive in Washington with nothing, but leave as millionaires
> and billionaires. Did their votes serve in the best interest
> of their constituents or did they only benefit themselves?
> If the representatives of your state fall in this category,
> then I suggest an investigation be launched.

FYI .... It has come to light that Comey was
> (or still is) on the Board of Directors of the HSBC Bank
> where the Clinton Foundation has holdings. ED KLEIN who
> wrote the book on the Clintons - coming out next week --
> said Hillary was called to the office of Valerie Jarrett and
> Obama back in 2009 and told her she had to stop sending
> emails thru her personal server ---OBVIOUSLY SHE DIDN'T
> LISTEN TO THEM. So, YES, Obama knew and Jarrett Knew and
> Huma knew along with how many others!!!! READ ON.....very
> interesting......

"FBI Director James Comey basically
> delivered a coded message to the American People and the
> world. He said...she is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt,
> certainly should not be president and should be brought to
> justice ..however our country has been infiltrated and is
> basically corrupt!

Now you know why he presented his case the> way he did and 
why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for indictment.

Also....The key is in what Comey said...80 email chains.....that means an exchange between people...Hillary sending AND RECEIVING.....so if he charges Hillary he has to charge the other in the chain...what if the exchange is with Obama...it is not a stretch to think the Sec of State would be in email contact with POTUS (PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES)...he has to charge the others in the chain...

Let's just say...Bill went to Loretta and said shut this down...or else if Hillary is charged she will tell under oath that some of the emails were with the President...so he is also guilty of a felony...THAT is IMPEACHABLE...the Republicans would go for it...the Dem would yell racism and the country erupts in violence......Lynch tells Comey...you better watch it or you could be to blame for violence tearing this country apart...what is he to do???...So Comey takes 20 minutes spelling out everything bad Hillary did....just like a trial in public.....then stops short to prevent any unrest......"BART LESLIE -

Coincidence? The law firm Kahn worked for is also the law firm for the royal court of Saudi Arabia and the tax lawyers for the Clintons and for the Clinton Foundation also the firm Loretta Lynch work for. They also represent a small Tech firm in Denver Colorado which so happens to be the same Tech firm that managed Hillary's private server.... Coincidence?

Photo

Get Your 'Hillary Liar' T-Shirt Before They're All Gone! 
(Just kidding, that's a lie but it is pretty cool)

ORDER YOUR HILLARY LIAR T-SHIRT TODAY!

Hillary Liar T-Shirt


Monday, September 5, 2016

Greater Motivator For Radical Islam: Kim Kardashian Or Franklin Graham? (Quiz)


For radical Islamist leaders and the followers they lead, who motivates them more to kill and destroy...Reality TV-star Kim Kardashian or Christian evangelist Franklin Graham?

In other words, of the people and issues that drive recruitment and serve as motivation for groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda to want all things and all people who do not think and believe like them wiped off the face of the earth, what is the greatest 'recruitment tool'...

Multiple Choice Quiz On The Motivations Of Radical Islam...

Who or what is the greatest factor behind recruitment of new followers to the beliefs of radical Islam and to the indiscriminate and senseless bombings and murders perpetrated by radical Islamists?
  1. Is it Kim Kardashian, Franklin Graham or someone else?
  2. Is it a video like the one that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Susan Rice and the rest of the Left claimed was the reason behind the attack on Benghazi where four American citizens including our Ambassador were brutally murdered?
  3. Is it women around the world who have the audacity to be seen without being hidden from head to toe and who work and live a Western lifestyle?
  4. Is it girls of school-age actually going to school?
  5. Is it every citizen of the world who does not think, act and believe as those who ascribe to the tenets of Sharia Law?
  6. All of the Above
Of course the answer is an emphatic #6 and, if and until the leaders in Washington and other governments around the world actually do what it takes to deal with the issue, the citizens of the world will remain in grave danger!



Get Your 'Hillary Liar' T-Shirt Before They're All Gone! 
(Just kidding, that's a lie but it is pretty cool)

ORDER YOUR HILLARY LIAR T-SHIRT TODAY!

Hillary Liar T-Shirt


Saturday, September 3, 2016

Question For Democrats: When Is Enough, Enough?


Why Democrats Why?

Watching the panel on the Trish Regan show yesterday discuss and debate Hillary Clinton and her commission of indiscretions/likely criminal offenses, I was inspired to email the resident Hillary apologist in the group.

The reason for my email to him was that I wanted a simple answer to what appears to the majority of Americans to be a simple question.

But, for the political class of liberal ideologues and low-information Democrat voters who will defend the Clinton clan at all costs, their answer will obviously something much different.

In the minds of those who will accept an incredible level of failure, actions detrimental to the well being of our national security, apparent perjury, destruction of government property in the form of emails and more, it appears that anything Hillary has done is completely acceptable if it means a Democrat will occupy the White House for another four years.

And how do they explain it all away?

Through deflection, obfuscation and  the fact that Hillary said that she's sorry and she won't do it again.

Try that 'I'm sorry' defense yourself one day when you are charged with even some petty crime and time how long it will be until you're laughed out of court.

But if you're a Clinton at the peak of power, politics means never having to say you're sorry and if by chance you do apologize, it can be completely insincere and disingenuous.

Why Democrats Why?

My Question Is Posed...

Hi (fill-in the name of any Democrat 'strategist):

Saw your segment on Trish Regan’s show and am motivated to ask the following. question.

Is there any impropriety/actions detrimental to the national security of the United States that might rise to a level that Democrat supporters will put patriotism and country above ideology and power?

On the other hand it is obvious that there is not.

Mike

The Liberal Response Is Proffered...

There was no intent on her part to harm the national security of the United States. Where as DT is in bed with Russian oligarchs 

My Follow-up Thoughts...

Thanks for getting back to me (fill-in the name of any Democrat 'strategist).

It would be impossible for either you or I to know the actual intent Hillary had for her actions as that is something only she knows in her heart.

What is obvious is that her actions have spoken much louder than her disingenuous words of apology, denial, ‘I can’t remembers’ or flippant joke making about incredibly serious issues on late night shows.

And the fact of the matter is that whatever the rationale was for what she has done it is impossible for you or I to know the extent to which she actually has brought harm to our national security or national security personnel. And, particularly given the height of her position,is ignorance of the law a viable excuse for breaking the law?

Further as an outside observer it certainly smells as if the private server that she had to have known at the very least went against protocol and at the worst violated federal law, had as its purpose keeping some of her actions private and not for mere convenience as she has stated.

I also think that it doesn’t take a Perry Mason to come to the conclusion that the Clinton Foundation is likely at the heart of those issues and actions she desired to keep private.

Finally I find it extremely disheartening that the common sense, integrity, honesty and trustworthiness of a potential leader of the free world is such an afterthought for the American people.

As I had said before, it would be refreshing if at some point the former Secretary of State’s indiscretions rose to a level that a Democrat, any Democrat, might question her suitability to hold the office of President of the United States.

And while I am painfully aware of the shortcomings of the GOP nominee, Hillary needs to be considered on her own merits and on that basis my humble opinion is that she should be disqualified from holding this office.

But, as a partisan finish to the email, I am sure that given her friends in the media, White House, DOJ and FBI that there is little likelihood for repercussions or accountability for anything that she has done.

Have a great weekend.

Mike

Still waiting for a response but if and when I get one, I'll surely let you know!

Related Article

Photo's that Explain Why Liberal Leaders Are Fine With Open Borders, Unvetted Refugees and Sanctuary Cities

Cartoon


Get Your 'Hillary Liar' T-Shirt Before They're All Gone! 
(Just kidding, that's a lie but it is pretty cool)

ORDER YOUR HILLARY LIAR T-SHIRT TODAY!

Hillary Liar T-Shirt


;